Post by account_disabled on Feb 25, 2024 2:04:04 GMT -5
Usually modified, but expanded", so the new order for regional federations will go ahead .This is, for now, a draft . That is, it can be ratified as is or it can be subject to review. Justice assures that the draft is being studied and that it will be approved by the Council of Ministers in the coming weeks. This draft reform of the Penal Code , to which El Confidencial Digital has had access , includes the following modifications: -- Fine of three to twelve months or imprisonment of three months to one year for the “distribution or public dissemination, through any means, of messages or slogans that incite the commission of some of the crimes of disturbing public order of the article 558, or that serve to reinforce the decision to carry them out. -- Said article 558 provides: “Those who seriously disturb order in the hearing of a court or tribunal, in the public acts of any authority will be punished with a prison sentence of three to six months or a fine of six to twelve months. or corporation , in a polling station, office or public establishment, educational center or on the occasion of the celebration of sporting or cultural events. -- The reform would also affect the organizers of events such as ' Occupy Congress '. Specifically, the Ministry of Justice plans to introduce into the Penal Code a penalty of between six months and one year in prison for citizens who commit a crime of passive resistance and disobedience. -- Article 550 would also be reformed as follows: “Those who attack or, with violence or intimidation, resist authority , its agents or public officials, are guilty of attacks.
Finally, the new article 557 would state that " those who disturb the public peace by carrying out acts of violence against people or things will be punished with a sentence of six months to three years in prison." See below the draft bill to reform the Special Database Penal Code – read it here -.With the title “ Pure and hard facts about what happens in this campaign with those 'judicial decisions' about 'the farms'”, Mario Conde denounces, without mentioning the name of Emilio Botín , president of Banco Santander, that the National Court “ "He did not want to investigate the 2,000 million euros found hidden in Switzerland owned by a well-known Spanish family." In the same line of accusations against justice , he also adds that “he gave in to the transfers of credit, a gigantic fraud against the state. He allowed, without conviction, some directors of a large Bank to hide tens of billions of pesetas in a foreign company… This and more things.” He attacks the National Court that ordered the seizure of the properties, chaired by Grande Marlaska , saying that he released “a murderous ETA member who does not repent,” alluding to the Bolinaga case.
And he concludes: “That same court, twelve years later, begins to “investigate” some properties, seizes them without requesting a rogatory commission and in the middle of the electoral campaign.” “I am running for election” The former president of Banesto wonders why the decision has now been made to seize the properties in Mallorca. "What happened? Haven't you had time in these twelve years? What's new? Legally nothing. The new thing is that I am running for election to the Galician Parliament. That's the new thing. Haven't they had more than enough time and is it now that they dictate those orders? Right now? Pure coincidence? ”. Mario Conde denies that the farms are his. It is asked why the judge did not send a rogatory commission to Luxembourg to verify this, and he responds that he did not want to do so “because they know that the answer will be that Mario Conde is not the owner, nor usufructuary, nor tenant, nor anything of that company. It's clear as water. They know it, but they don't want to do it. Because? Because again, once again, they want to fabricate their truth. So it was to lock me up.
Finally, the new article 557 would state that " those who disturb the public peace by carrying out acts of violence against people or things will be punished with a sentence of six months to three years in prison." See below the draft bill to reform the Special Database Penal Code – read it here -.With the title “ Pure and hard facts about what happens in this campaign with those 'judicial decisions' about 'the farms'”, Mario Conde denounces, without mentioning the name of Emilio Botín , president of Banco Santander, that the National Court “ "He did not want to investigate the 2,000 million euros found hidden in Switzerland owned by a well-known Spanish family." In the same line of accusations against justice , he also adds that “he gave in to the transfers of credit, a gigantic fraud against the state. He allowed, without conviction, some directors of a large Bank to hide tens of billions of pesetas in a foreign company… This and more things.” He attacks the National Court that ordered the seizure of the properties, chaired by Grande Marlaska , saying that he released “a murderous ETA member who does not repent,” alluding to the Bolinaga case.
And he concludes: “That same court, twelve years later, begins to “investigate” some properties, seizes them without requesting a rogatory commission and in the middle of the electoral campaign.” “I am running for election” The former president of Banesto wonders why the decision has now been made to seize the properties in Mallorca. "What happened? Haven't you had time in these twelve years? What's new? Legally nothing. The new thing is that I am running for election to the Galician Parliament. That's the new thing. Haven't they had more than enough time and is it now that they dictate those orders? Right now? Pure coincidence? ”. Mario Conde denies that the farms are his. It is asked why the judge did not send a rogatory commission to Luxembourg to verify this, and he responds that he did not want to do so “because they know that the answer will be that Mario Conde is not the owner, nor usufructuary, nor tenant, nor anything of that company. It's clear as water. They know it, but they don't want to do it. Because? Because again, once again, they want to fabricate their truth. So it was to lock me up.